J. Phys. II France
Volume 4, Numéro 4, April 1994
Page(s) 581 - 588
References of J. Phys. II France 4 581-588
  1. Watanabe J. and Hayashi M., Macromolecules 21 1988) 278.
  2. Watanabe J. and Hayashi M., Macromolecules 22 (1989) 4083 [CrossRef].
  3. Watanabe J., Hayashi M., Kinoshita S. and Niori T., Polym. J. (Japan) 24 (1992) 597.
  4. Watanabe J. and Kinoshita S., J. Phys. Ii France 2 (1992) 1237 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  5. Takanishi Y., Takezoe H., Fukuda A. and Watanabe J., Phys. Rev. B 45 (1992) 7684 [CrossRef].
  6. Watanabe J., Komura H. and Niori T., Liq. Cryst. 13 (1993) 455 [CrossRef].
  7. Watanabe J., Hayashi M., Morita A. and Niori T., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., in press.
  8. In the previous reports, this phase has been termed S c2 phase, but S c2 is a confusing notation in the context of the nomenclature described in low molar mass systems. For this reason, we will hereafter adopt the notation of S c2 which has been adopted for the same type of smectic phase in low molar mass system by Fukuda et al.; Chandani A.D.L., Gorecka E., Ouchi Y., Takezoe H. and Fukuda A., Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 28 (1989) L1265 [CrossRef].
  9. Abe A., Macromolecules 17 (1984) 2280 [CrossRef].
  10. Petscheck R.G. and Wiefling K.M., Phys. Rev. Let. 59 (1987) 343 [CrossRef].
  11. International Table for X-ray Crystallography (1959) Vol. I (Birmingham, Kynoch Press) p. 208.
  12. It should be noted here that this space group is essentially different from that of the S $_{\scriptsize\textrm{Ca}}$ phase which is analogous to the crystallographic D52h [4, 11].
  13. Meyer R.B., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 40 (1977) 33.
  14. Nakata Y., Shimizu K. and Watanabe J., to be published.
  15. Sigaud G., Hardouin F., Achard M.F. and Levelut A.M., J. Phys. France 42 (1981) 107 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences].
  16. Prost J. and Barois P., J. Chim. Phys. 80 (1983) 65.
  17. Prost J., Adv. Phys.33 (1984) 1.
  18. It should noted here that the fundamental bilayer smectic phase has a biaxial character and so another frustrated structure can be also proposed such that the unusual density modulation occurs in a direction perpendicular to the tilt direction. In the present time, we cannot select one of these two models since the X-ray pattern has been observed only for the fiber specimen. However, even if any model is adopted, the structural characteristics described here are not essentially altered.
  19. Endres B.M., Ebert M., Wendorff J.H., Reck B. and Ringsdorf H., Liq. Cryst. 7 (1990) 217 [CrossRef].
  20. Mensinger H., Biswas A. and Poths H., Macromolecules 25 (1992) 3156 [CrossRef].