J. Phys. II France
Volume 4, Numéro 4, April 1994
|Page(s)||581 - 588|
References of J. Phys. II France 4 581-588
- Watanabe J. and Hayashi M., Macromolecules 21 1988) 278.
- Watanabe J. and Hayashi M., Macromolecules 22 (1989) 4083 [CrossRef].
- Watanabe J., Hayashi M., Kinoshita S. and Niori T., Polym. J. (Japan) 24 (1992) 597.
- Watanabe J. and Kinoshita S., J. Phys. Ii France 2 (1992) 1237 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
- Takanishi Y., Takezoe H., Fukuda A. and Watanabe J., Phys. Rev. B 45 (1992) 7684 [CrossRef].
- Watanabe J., Komura H. and Niori T., Liq. Cryst. 13 (1993) 455 [CrossRef].
- Watanabe J., Hayashi M., Morita A. and Niori T., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., in press.
- In the previous reports, this phase has been termed S c2 phase, but S c2 is a confusing notation in the context of the nomenclature described in low molar mass systems. For this reason, we will hereafter adopt the notation of S c2 which has been adopted for the same type of smectic phase in low molar mass system by Fukuda et al.; Chandani A.D.L., Gorecka E., Ouchi Y., Takezoe H. and Fukuda A., Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 28 (1989) L1265 [CrossRef].
- Abe A., Macromolecules 17 (1984) 2280 [CrossRef].
- Petscheck R.G. and Wiefling K.M., Phys. Rev. Let. 59 (1987) 343 [CrossRef].
- International Table for X-ray Crystallography (1959) Vol. I (Birmingham, Kynoch Press) p. 208.
- It should be noted here that this space group is essentially different from that of the S phase which is analogous to the crystallographic D52h [4, 11].
- Meyer R.B., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 40 (1977) 33.
- Nakata Y., Shimizu K. and Watanabe J., to be published.
- Sigaud G., Hardouin F., Achard M.F. and Levelut A.M., J. Phys. France 42 (1981) 107 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences].
- Prost J. and Barois P., J. Chim. Phys. 80 (1983) 65.
- Prost J., Adv. Phys.33 (1984) 1.
- It should noted here that the fundamental bilayer smectic phase has a biaxial character and so another frustrated structure can be also proposed such that the unusual density modulation occurs in a direction perpendicular to the tilt direction. In the present time, we cannot select one of these two models since the X-ray pattern has been observed only for the fiber specimen. However, even if any model is adopted, the structural characteristics described here are not essentially altered.
- Endres B.M., Ebert M., Wendorff J.H., Reck B. and Ringsdorf H., Liq. Cryst. 7 (1990) 217 [CrossRef].
- Mensinger H., Biswas A. and Poths H., Macromolecules 25 (1992) 3156 [CrossRef].