Issue |
J. Phys. II France
Volume 4, Number 12, December 1994
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 2149 - 2159 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/jp2:1994253 |
J. Phys. II France 4 (1994) 2149-2159
Comparison between the tilted SmC
and SmC
phases of
MHPOBC studied by optical techniques
John Philip, Jean-René Lalanne, Jean-Paul Marcerou and Gilles Sigaud Centre de Recherches Paul Pascal, CNRS, Avenue du docteur Albert Schweitzer, 33600 Pessac, France
(Received 1 July 1994, received in final form 7 September 1994, accepted 12 September 1994)
Abstract
We present optical investigations in the SmC
and SmC
phases of a low
molar mass chiral liquid crystal, 4-(1-methylheptyloxycarbonyl) phenyl 4
'-octyloxy
biphenyl-4-carboxylate [MHPOBC(R)]. The polarizing microscope observations (PMO), optical rotatory
power (ORP) and anisotropic Rayleigh scattering (ARS) investigations show that the smectic
C
structure strongly differs from the SmC
phase. The ORP in the smectic
C
phase has been found to be very weak (less than 0.2 deg/mm), compared to ordinary
liquids with strongly chiral molecules and to other smectic C
* phases. Although pretransitional
ORP effects in the vicinity of the SmA
SmC
* phase transition have been
reported earlier in chiral liquid crystals, no such behaviour is noticed in this compound at the
SmA
SmC
and SmC
SmC
*
phase transitions. The absence of critical behaviour in the ARS at the
SmA
SmC
phase transition is a clear indication of the
nonexistence of "local biaxial" character of the SmC
phase. Moreover, the PMO
studies also confirm the "macroscopically uniaxial nature" of all these phases except
SmC
phase, which was found to be birefringent. The possibility of a divergence
in the "biaxial fluctuations" at the SmC
Sm
phase transition is also discussed.
© Les Editions de Physique 1994